|
Page 11 of 12 |
[ 138 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Next |
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Infrequent Pinecam poster Joined: Aug 6, 2009 8:28 am
Posts: 28
Location: Conifer
|
codejunky wrote: Hmm after reading 285Bound posts it makes me wonder if Grandma is also related to Grady? Maybe?
Or what if Grandma IS Grady Harn? |
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Posts Semi-Regularly Joined: Jul 29, 2007 10:26 am
Posts: 249
|
I was wondering who was wearing the pants...now I really don't want to know.
|
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Posts pretty often Joined: May 28, 2007 9:50 pm
Posts: 108
Location: Way down Elk Creek!
|
I wear pants, I never get accused of shacking up with granny.
I do think tiller bee sounds cute though. ( ps) these comments are as meaningful as most of the comments on here. The one that really got me is "the board is professional now" Have they even had a meeting since Bartlett resigned? And what makes the "professional?" The old board ran on a platform of be nice, do your job, act like adults... and they are all gone. So what does that mean. The professionals are professional at not working, at being mean and acting like children? Where does one got to school to become a professional board member? Where ever it was, I think it is abundantly clear that ethics were not a required course. KS (due to inflation I now charge a nickel for my 2 cents) |
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Oh my, Big Time poster! Joined: Aug 14, 2004 1:56 pm
Posts: 4228
Location: Shaffers Crossing
|
codejunky wrote: Hmm after reading 285Bound posts it makes me wonder if Grandma is also related to Grady? Maybe?
Good chance that some of the supporters for the other two candidates are relatives too... |
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Infrequent Pinecam poster Joined: Apr 28, 2012 9:18 pm
Posts: 22
|
Elk Creek has had problems in the past. Names like Dolan and Biglen have been in the paper time and time again, but these people are no longer with the department. Elk Creek has worked hard to get its house in order. Today, they have good people, a new chief, a supportive board, and what they are doing is working. Look at the leadership roll Elk Creek played in the recent disaster. Agencies across the state (and beyond) are looking to Elk Creek for advice.
Things are finally on the right track. Why mess it up now? Why change a winning team. I believe we should let the board continue with the good work they have undertaken. Elk Creek hasn’t been this strong in recent history. Do we really want to risk throwing all that away? As a wise person once said, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” And for once in recent memory Elk Creek isn’t broken. |
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Stratospheric Poster! ![]() Joined: Feb 23, 2006 10:47 am
Posts: 6295
|
homeagain wrote: SpudWrench wrote: The Regular Special District Election for the Elk Creek Fire Protection District will be held Tuesday, May 8, 2012, from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. (Note that anyone who is waiting in line at 7:00 p.m. will be allowed to vote) This will be a walk-in vote. The polling place will be: Elk Creek Fire Department Station 1 11993 Blackfoot Road Conifer, CO 80433 Subject of the election: Two Directors will be elected to serve on the Elk Creek Fire Protection District Board of Directors. There are three candidates running for the office. Their names are: Mr. Gregory P. Branch, Mr. Grady Harn, and Mr. Alec Schwatrz To be eligible to vote, you must be registered to vote in the State of Colorado and be either: A resident within the Elk Creek Fire Protection District at least thirty (30) days prior to Election Day, or The owner of taxable real or personal property situated within the Elk Creek Fire Protection District. (A person who is obligated to pay taxes under a contract to purchase taxable property situated within the Elk Creek Fire Protection District. The owner must be a natural person, not a corporation, trust, partnership, etc.), or The spouse of the owner of taxable real or personal property situated within the Elk Creek Fire Protection District, and Voters must provide valid identification. Just a reminder that the vote is tomorrow (Tuesday) and your DUE DILIGENCE is required when casting your vote......I am confident that the choices made will bring POLITICAL PEACE and a BETTER fire department.JMO REMINDER........today is the day to VOTE......make it count. _________________ Be who u are and say what u feel, Because those who mind,don't matter and those who matter,don't mind.....Dr. Seuss |
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Posts pretty often Joined: Jul 26, 2007 9:54 pm
Posts: 82
|
SpudWrench wrote: Elk Creek has had problems in the past. Names like Dolan and Biglen have been in the paper time and time again, but these people are no longer with the department. Elk Creek has worked hard to get its house in order. Today, they have good people, a new chief, a supportive board, and what they are doing is working. Look at the leadership roll Elk Creek played in the recent disaster. Agencies across the state (and beyond) are looking to Elk Creek for advice.
Things are finally on the right track. Why mess it up now? Why change a winning team. I believe we should let the board continue with the good work they have undertaken. Elk Creek hasn’t been this strong in recent history. Do we really want to risk throwing all that away? As a wise person once said, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” And for once in recent memory Elk Creek isn’t broken. Sounds like we should have a celebration! That awards should be given that all should be honored! Who could have ever guessed that such amazing feats were possible! That the HTT would be the trend setter for all things good and evil; that having a Board president that has admitted to stealing documents from the department and faxing them to other entities from his homes would be viewed as honorable; that a BOD that is "dating"? the old district administrator ( the one who hid IRS statements in a drawer costing the district thousands and thousands of dollars) would think this is ok; That this same BOD would send a message to the general membership that hazing actives are OK, is not broken. That losing member after member after member is "moving in the right direction".
Hazing, degrading, name calling, stealing, defacing, disrespecting, devaluing, segregating, discriminating, or just plain being mean is NEVER professional, and certainly should never be viewed as "not broken" ( these comments can be supported through BOD minutes, recordings, rosters and other documents available to the public through public records requests.) Regardless, get out and vote today. Vote for diversity. Vote because it is your constitutional right. Vote to keep a check and balance. For whatever reason, Vote! |
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Pinecam Hall of Fame poster! ![]() Joined: Oct 5, 2005 6:47 pm
Posts: 10273
|
please, if you want to promote the professionalism in your canidate, please be professional yourself.
|
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Posts pretty often Joined: May 28, 2007 9:50 pm
Posts: 108
Location: Way down Elk Creek!
|
WG2... who are you responding to?
|
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Pinecam Hall of Fame poster! ![]() Joined: Oct 5, 2005 6:47 pm
Posts: 10273
|
everyone
unfortunately, those who think it's directed to are probably not the ones being unprofessional, those that need the advise have no clue how they come across. and it's directed to me as well - I've wanted so badly to respond to some of the very stupid comments, but I remind myself to 'remain professional' and not say what i really want to - If it would do some good - that's different, but since it would only inflame, then no. |
| Top | |
|
Post subject:
|
|
![]() Posts pretty often Joined: Mar 18, 2006 4:40 pm
Posts: 78
Location: Kings Valley
|
Congratulations to Greg Branch and Alec Schwartz, the two men elected to the Elk Creek Fire Board today. I wish them well.
|
| Top | |
|
Page 11 of 12 |
[ 138 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Next |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |
In total there are 107 users online :: 20 registered, 12 hidden and 75 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 2823 on Mar 26, 2012 7:26 pm
Users browsing this forum: BeerGodROX, Bing [Bot], climberdennis, Doodlebug, GeorgeS, gia58, Google Adsense [Bot], hilltopstudios, jewelya, JJ mt_man, LogMan, MSN [Bot], MtRider, Nate, netuser99, Opus007, pinkpuggies, spinster, The Sharpened Axe, wxgeek and 75 guests